Behavioural
A stakeholder, partner, or team changes what it does.
Evidence before assertion
Credibility requires traceable proof.
A crowded room, a positive response, and a change in practice are different results. AGC separates them because each supports a different claim. The larger the claim, the more direct the evidence must be.
[04 / 06]
Evidence hierarchy
Adoption carries more weight than admiration.
A testimonial can show appreciation. Attendance can show interest. Engagement data can show attention. None of these, on its own, shows that an institution changed a decision, policy, plan, or practice.
Documentary
A tool, policy, plan, decision, or process carries the change forward.
Relational
Actors align, coordinate, or use a shared influence logic under real pressure.
Interpretive
A claim, frame, or concept is repeated and used accurately by others.
Case-note standard
A useful case states the evidence and the limit of the conclusion.
01
Context and operating conditions
02
What was at stake
03
Observed failure pattern
04
What the diagnostic revealed
05
Intervention and tools developed
06
Evidence of use or adoption
07
Limits of the conclusion
Current evidence position
Why there are no client logos or case claims here yet
AGC will name a client, publish a result, or use a logo only after reviewing the supporting evidence and receiving permission to disclose the work. Until those conditions are met, this page will state what is known about the method and where the evidence stops.